December 28, 2023
(press release)
–
This post includes topics addressed in the Q1 2024 Forisk Research Quarterly (FRQ) and the (virtual) Applied Forest Finance course on March 14th, 2024. In the Q2 and Q3 2022 editions of the Forisk Research Quarterly, I wrote about forecasting forest carbon prices and tracking market trends, and noted that, “the supply of forest carbon credits, unlike forest supplies themselves, require enrollment and validation processes that are somewhat disconnected from actual demand.” Recent reporting affirms this reality while putting into stark context the status of carbon emissions relative to sequestration efforts and forest carbon pricing. According to Casey Crownhart of Technology Review[1], carbon emissions, while slowing, look to reach all-time highs in 2023 while efforts to remove carbon and other greenhouse gases (GHGs) from the atmosphere remain, relatively speaking, “miniscule.” The ratio of emissions-to-removals remains daunting: “…emissions from fossil fuels were millions of times higher than carbon removal levels this year.” To date, forestry has played a larger role in carbon sequestration than technologically driven approaches. Unfortunately, while nature-based solutions such as afforestation and replanting have progressed, they continue to play catch-up when compared to deforestation and other sources of land-use change. In 2022, Forisk conducted break-even analysis of one-year harvest deferral contracts for landowners associated with forest carbon. The results indicated that per acre payments for a mature loblolly pine forest in the Piedmont region of the U.S. South, inclusive of opportunity costs, would exceed $40, depending on key timber price and forest growth assumptions, and landowner investment horizons. At the time of that analysis in 2022, carbon credits in the U.S. traded around $8. More recently, in November 2023, the Asian Development Bank’s climate envoy told Reuters that investors and emitting firms require carbon offset prices in the $25 to $35 range to spur activity.[2] And yet, the price per credit remains in the $8 range for sequestering carbon in forests via the voluntary market, or up to $11 according to Ecosystem Marketplace. Forest carbon markets, in facilitating trade between buyers and sellers, assign values that, effectively, set prices on the “right” to emit carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. However, current price levels reflect a certain uncertainty on the part of investors. Emitting firms logically prefer the lowest-cost options available to them, which include improving energy efficiency and growing wind and solar energy capacities, in addition to growing forests. Unfortunately, low prices also demotivate firms and disinterest investors. # [1] “Fossil-fuel emissions are over a million times greater than carbon removal efforts” by Casey Crownhart, Technology Review, December 4, 2023. Available at: https://www.technologyreview.com/2023/12/04/1084381/fossil-fuel-emissions-carbon-removal-efforts/ [2] https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/climate-energy/carbon-offset-price-25-35ton-would-boost-climate-action-adb-climate-envoy-2023-11-16/Trees vs Technology
Carbon Prices and Forestry
Conclusion
* All content is copyrighted by Industry Intelligence, or the original respective author or source. You may not recirculate, redistrubte or publish the analysis and presentation included in the service without Industry Intelligence's prior written consent. Please review our terms of use.
