Washington state's new carbon project undercuts climate goals, says American Forest Resource Council; it calls for Board of Natural Resources to have DNR analyze, disclose a detailed analysis of strategy's environmental, social, economic costs/benefits

Sample article from our Forestry & Timberland

PORTLAND, Oregon , April 7, 2022 (press release) –

American Forest Resource Council (AFRC) President Travis Joseph had the following to say regarding the Washington Department of Natural Resources’ (DNR) ‘carbon project’ on public working forests known as state trust lands:

“DNR should follow the recommendations of the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change that the best way to mitigate climate change is through science-based, sustainable forest management. This includes planting and growing trees, harvesting and manufacturing wood products for carbon storage, and replanting and starting the sustainable cycle over again on the half of DNR state trust lands that remain open for timber harvest.  This cycle ensures our forests remain forested forever while meeting society’s needs for carbon-friendly wood products.

“Unfortunately, DNR’s ‘carbon project’ is the same failed approach of the last 30 years under a new name: walking away from our forests and hoping bugs, disease, mortality, and catastrophic wildfires don’t destroy the resources, wildlife, and communities we’re trying to protect.  Our public forests are burning at alarming rates.  Demand for affordable housing and lumber are on the rise.  We’re losing milling infrastructure as we import more finished wood products from overseas.  Washingtonians are looking for a new, bold path to working with our forests to meet our needs while continuing to protect the environment.  This announcement is more of the status quo.

“We’re concerned that Commissioner Franz is moving forward – with no analysis or recognition of the consequences – to link the future of the Department, Washington’s forest workers and green infrastructure, and our public forests to complex and controversial financial markets with uncertain environmental outcomes.  Washington’s public forests should be managed by experts and trained professionals, not by deep-pocketed organizations and politically connected financiers running public relations campaigns.

“At a minimum, before taking further action, the Board of Natural Resources should require the Department to analyze and publicly disclose a detailed analysis of the environmental, social, and economic costs and benefits of this direction.  From our perspective, importing more wood from outside Washington and the U.S., using less carbon friendly materials such as concrete and steel to substitute for wood, and reducing Washington’s green workforce and infrastructure needed to respond to our forest health crisis – the real world consequences of this plan – will undercut Washington’s ambitious climate change goals, not help achieve them.”

Background

A bipartisan 2020 state law acknowledges the essential role Washington state’s forest sector and working forests play in removing greenhouse gases from the atmosphere, and affirming it is in the public’s interest for state policies to support all aspects of a fully integrated forest sector in the state. Without a sustainable and predictable supply of timber from state trust lands, Washington will continue to lose this green infrastructure.

According to the University of Washington’s Forest Carbon Study, Washington’s private working forests and forest sector are a “Below Net Zero” carbon emitter. Although the processes associated with manufacturing wood and paper products emit some greenhouse gasses, growing and harvesting trees and using wood products store more carbon than is emitted, reducing Washington’s carbon footprint by 12 percent.

The DNR already has several policies in place to conserve older forests. Nearly half of DNR trust lands in western Washington are no longer available for sustainable timber management under the Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) and other policies set by the Board of Natural Resources.  Nearly 90 percent of the stands over 120 years

* All content is copyrighted by Industry Intelligence, or the original respective author or source. You may not recirculate, redistrubte or publish the analysis and presentation included in the service without Industry Intelligence's prior written consent. Please review our terms of use.

See our dashboard in action - schedule an demo
Chelsey Quick
Chelsey Quick
- VP Client Success -

We offer built-to-order forestry & timberland coverage for our clients. Contact us for a free consultation.

About Us

We deliver market news & information relevant to your business.

We monitor all your market drivers.

We aggregate, curate, filter and map your specific needs.

We deliver the right information to the right person at the right time.

Our Contacts

1990 S Bundy Dr. Suite #380,
Los Angeles, CA 90025

+1 (310) 553 0008

About Cookies On This Site

We collect data, including through use of cookies and similar technology ("cookies") that enchance the online experience. By clicking "I agree", you agree to our cookies, agree to bound by our Terms of Use, and acknowledge our Privacy Policy. For more information on our data practices and how to exercise your privacy rights, please see our Privacy Policy.