June 27, 2024
(press release)
–
A summary of the FIRNS-funded project, led by Forest Carbon In March 2024, the FIRNS (Facility for Investment Ready Nature in Scotland) project led by Forest Carbon, in collaboration with Finance Earth and Angus Davidson Ltd came to an end. This FIRNS project looked at peatland restoration on crofting territories, namely on land that’s subject to common grazing rights and was supported by a development grant provided by NatureScot. In March we released Part 1 of this article, which covered: What is common grazing land? What is the objective of these projects? What difference will these projects make? As promised, we are following up with this article (Part 2) to cover the key findings from the final report. Project context It is estimated that degraded peatlands in Scotland account for around 15% of Scotland's total net emissions. SRUC estimates peatland covers 348,000 ha of common grazings. To date, there has been limited delivery of peatland restoration projects on crofting and common grazing land. More context can be found on slide 7 of the final report. Key project objectives The key objectives of this Project were as follows: Key findings from the final FIRNS project report and supporting legal paper Landlords and shareholders hesitate to engage in carbon-related activities due to a lack of clarity on several fronts. The main areas of concern are: A lack of clear guidance on farm carbon accounting and undetermined ‘Net Zero’ requirements Uncertain connections between agricultural support and emissions reductions Peatland restoration project funding Stakeholder engagement at the two Pilot sites revealed some obstacles for shareholders and landlords in delivering peatland restoration projects and using carbon funding. Two models were explored: A shareholder and landlord-led model, where both parties agree on income distribution. An investor-led model, where an investor finances the project and compensates shareholders and landlords through lease or profit-sharing agreements. The FIRNS Project identified the investor-led model as a way to transfer certain risks to an investor, allowing landowners and occupiers to delegate restoration and maintenance responsibilities. However, limited awareness and understanding of financing options, along with limited private finance packages (whether this is a lease or joint venture type arrangement), restricts the practicality of this option. More on the viable governance models we found in slide 10 of the final report. The final FIRNS report highlights unique challenges in delivering peatland restoration projects on common grazing land, due to an uncertain legal framework for carbon credit ownership and the complexities of the Crofting Act. Harper Macleod's legal review identifies Sections 19A and 50B as the most promising legal pathways for peatland restoration on crofting land. Section 50B of the Crofters (Scotland) Act 1993 is relevant for crofter-led peatland restoration projects. Crofters are unlikely to own the carbon without explicit rights being granted by the landlord, limiting their ability to claim carbon credits. This route is untested and needs to be established with the Crofting Commission as a method for proceeding with peatland restoration, but there is potential for 'crofter application' projects to access rights to carbon through an express agreement from the landlord. Section 19A ("Scheme for Development") offers the most likely legal route for landlord-led projects. Requires application to the Scottish Land Court, but has yet to become an established route for proceeding with peatland restoration and if approved would partially restrict crofters' rights with the provision of financial compensation. This route is not yet established for peatland restoration but shows promise. In both situations, cooperation between crofters and landlords is essential. Potential legal reforms may offer clarity on the legal pathways. There is further consideration to allow for joint peatland ventures between crofters and landlords, similar to forestry ventures, to facilitate peatland restoration and carbon sequestration. More on the legal pathways in slide 9 of the final report. Recommendations for the Scottish Government The final FIRNS report also presented three key recommendations for the Scottish Government, as follows: Support the creation of a Scotland Carbon Fund to manage financial and delivery risks while also ensuring a steady income for occupiers and landowners, thereby facilitating the attraction of private investment. The development of such a fund could go some way to unlocking restoration projects by reducing some areas of delivery and price risk. Help to clarify future net zero obligations and uncertainties in peatland carbon accounting obligations for occupiers and landlords, so that early movers in this market are not penalised. Ensure dedicated ringfenced funding for projects on crofting tenure land, acknowledging unique delivery challenges. More on our recommendations in slide 28 of the final report. Pilot projects’ status and future support Despite discussions being undertaken with stakeholders across both projects, no formal agreement was reached on a definitive legal pathway for proceeding with restoration. The FIRNS project partners wish to continue to support both Pilots towards identifying a preferred legal pathway and exploring access to a range of funding models. By way of example, Forest Carbon and Angus Davidson have been asked to present to the Councillors of Shetland Islands Council (one of the FIRNS project stakeholders) in September 2024 as part of ongoing efforts related to the FIRNS project. Following the final report, FIRNS project partners are developing a systems map. This map aims to further the understanding of challenges associated with delivering peatland restoration on crofting tenure land and gather ideas for potential solutions. Please contact us if you would like a link to the systems map to be shared with you once it is up and running. Contact details If you would like to discuss any aspect of the FIRNS project, please feel free to contact: You will find the final FIRNS report here, and the legal paper here.
Pilot 1: A 378-ha proposed restoration project on Arnol Common Grazings, Isle of Lewis, owned by Barvas Estate Trust. An overview of this project can be found on slide 11 of the final report
Pilot 2: A 141-ha restoration project on Ollaberry, Collafirth, and Crookster Common Grazings, Shetland Islands, owned by Shetland Islands Council. An overview of this project can be found on slide 12 of the final report.
Barvas, Isle of Lewis (Pilot 1). Photo by Angus Davidson Ltd.
Ollaberry, Shetland Islands (Pilot 2). Photo by George Hepburne-Scott.
Challenges
Lack of clarity causes hesitation on peatland restoration
There is insufficient guidance on the accounting of peatland emissions on common grazings, and the inclusion of these emissions in potential Net Zero reporting. This issue is compounded by inconsistencies in farm carbon audit tools, as highlighted by a Defra-funded report produced by RSK ADAS (June 2023). Those managing land need to closely consider current and future landholding emissions before engaging with carbon markets.
It is anticipated there will be growing requirements in the UK to reduce agricultural emissions within the food supply chain, such as Morrison’s ambition to become ‘Net Zero’ by 2030 within the British farms they buy directly from. Farmers need clear and consistent requirements to effectively plan and fund necessary changes, including the likely need to restore degraded peatlands occupied by livestock.
The business case for each Pilot project showed potential for carbon revenue generation that could be stacked on top of the existing Agri-Environment Climate Scheme payments and additional income generated by the occupiers from sheep farming.
The Scottish Government stated in June 2023 that in the future at least half of all funding for farming and crofting will be targeted towards outcomes for biodiversity gain and climate mitigation and adaptation. However, crofters require clarity on how they can benefit from these payments and access emerging private nature-based markets for carbon and biodiversity. Clear guidance and consistent policies are essential to support the delivery and long-term management of peatland restoration initiatives.
More on these challenges is covered on slides 21, 25 and 32 the final report.
Peatland restoration projects are sensitive to changes in funding, needing increased private sector investment to cover public funding constraints. Long commitment periods and risks, such as market and delivery risks associated with selling Peatland Code-certified credits, were raised as potential challenges. The voluntary carbon market is complex and difficult to navigate for those unfamiliar with the sector, with language and terminology acting as barriers.
Further complexity is added in the case of common grazings, which, where regulated, comprise grazings committees and individual shareholders. All individuals need access to the necessary tools and information to participate in decision-making.
There are no standard 'peatland restoration management' agreements currently available for occupiers and landowners. Templates, that could be adapted to reflect the specifics of a site, would help define roles and responsibilities, including contractual obligations under the Peatland Code, carbon sales contracts, and Peatland ACTION grant funding. This would allow all participants involved in the delivery of projects to better understand the associated risks and rewards.
More on peatland restoration funding in slides 8 and 26 of the final report.Opportunities
We explored two potentially viable governance models for peatland restoration on common grazings
Legal pathways exist but require cooperation
Page 9 of the final reportPathway 1: Crofter-Led Applications
Pathway 2: Landlord-Led Applications
Systems map
* All content is copyrighted by Industry Intelligence, or the original respective author or source. You may not recirculate, redistrubte or publish the analysis and presentation included in the service without Industry Intelligence's prior written consent. Please review our terms of use.
