US construction employment in 12 months to January rose in 38 states, fell in nine states and District of Columbia, held steady in three states; Florida, California, Texas added the most jobs, while Indiana, West Virginia lost the most: AGC of America

Allison Oesterle

Allison Oesterle

ARLINGTON, Virginia , March 17, 2014 (press release) – Kansas and Florida Rack up the Largest 12-Month Gains, Wyoming and Indiana Have Biggest Declines; Idaho and Ohio Top Monthly Rankings, While Vermont and California Shed the Most Jobs in January

Construction firms added jobs in 38 states between January 2013 and January 2014, while 27 states experienced construction employment gains between December and January, according to an analysis today by the Associated General Contractors of America of Labor Department data. Association officials said the fact so many states added construction jobs for the year and month despite harsh winter conditions in many parts of the country is a sign that demand appears to be recovering.

"Especially considering the fact many parts of the country experienced very harsh weather in January, these construction jobs figures are particularly robust," said Ken Simonson, the association's chief economist. "Yet some of these gains will be at risk if federal transportation funding comes to halt this summer as predicted."

Kansas led all states with a 10.7 percent rise (5,900 jobs) in construction employment between January 2013 and January 2014. Other states adding a high percentage of new construction jobs for the year included Oregon (9.4 percent, 6,600 jobs); Florida (9.2 percent, 32,700 jobs); Minnesota (9.2 percent, 8,900 jobs) and Alaska (9.1 percent, 1,500 jobs). Florida added the most jobs for the year, followed by California (27,300 jobs, 4.4 percent); Texas (26,000 jobs, 4.3 percent) and Ohio (11,600 jobs, 6.3 percent).

Nine states and the District of Columbia lost jobs between January 2013 and 2014, while construction employment was unchanged in three other states. Wyoming (-5.9 percent, -1,300 jobs) experienced the largest annual percentage loss, followed by West Virginia (-5.4 percent, -1,900 jobs); New Hampshire (-4.4 percent, -1,000 jobs) and D.C. (-4.3 percent, -600 jobs). Indiana (-3,700 jobs, -3.0 percent) lost the most jobs for the year, followed by West Virginia, Wyoming and New Jersey (-1,300 jobs, -1.0 percent).

Idaho (5.8 percent, 1,900 jobs) added the highest percentage of new construction jobs between December and January, followed by Arkansas (5.0 percent, 2,300 jobs); Kansas (4.6 percent, 2,700 jobs) and New Jersey (4.4 percent, 5,700 jobs). Ohio (8,000 jobs, 4.3 percent) added the most jobs for the month. Other states adding a high number of jobs for the month included New York (7,900 jobs, 2.5 percent); Pennsylvania (7,500 jobs, 3.4 percent) and North Carolina (6,400 jobs, 3.7 percent).

For the month, 21 states and the District of Columbia lost construction jobs while employment levels were unchanged in two others. Vermont (-5.5 percent, -800 jobs) experienced the largest percentage decline, followed by Iowa (-3.8 percent, -2,600 jobs); Indiana (-3.4 percent, -4,300 jobs) and Missouri (-3.1 percent, -3,300 jobs). California (-6,600 jobs, -1.0 percent) shed the most construction jobs for the month, followed by Indiana, Missouri and Iowa.

Association officials said the construction employment figures were an encouraging sign that demand was rebounding after years of weak demand. But they warned that new predictions that the federal Highway Trust Fund, which finances highway, bridge and transit construction across the country, would hit a zero balance by this summer could undermine the sector's recovery during the middle of the construction season.

"Right now demand seems strong enough in many parts of the country to keep many people working in harsh, wintery conditions," said Stephen E. Sandherr, the association's chief executive officer. "But demand for new workers will certainly cool this summer should Congress and the administration fail to address the looming transportation funding shortfalls that threaten billions of dollars worth of construction projects."

View construction employment figures by state and by rank.

* All content is copyrighted by Industry Intelligence, or the original respective author or source. You may not recirculate, redistrubte or publish the analysis and presentation included in the service without Industry Intelligence's prior written consent. Please review our terms of use.

Share:

About Us

We deliver market news & information relevant to your business.

We monitor all your market drivers.

We aggregate, curate, filter and map your specific needs.

We deliver the right information to the right person at the right time.

Our Contacts

1990 S Bundy Dr. Suite #380,
Los Angeles, CA 90025

+1 (310) 553 0008

About Cookies On This Site

We collect data, including through use of cookies and similar technology ("cookies") that enchance the online experience. By clicking "I agree", you agree to our cookies, agree to bound by our Terms of Use, and acknowledge our Privacy Policy. For more information on our data practices and how to exercise your privacy rights, please see our Privacy Policy.