UK's proposal to cap new biomass projects eligible for support under its Renewable Obligation at 400 MW is flawed, says REA; CEO notes up to 1,000MW of biomass projects are in active development
Allison Oesterle
LONDON
,
May 13, 2013
(press release)
–
The race is on: Biomass project developers rush to fit their projects within the 400MW cap
“The entire concept of capping new dedicated biomass capacity is wrong. There may be as much as 1,000MW of projects still in active development, yet DECC wants to limit the build to only 400MW.” “Whilst the proposal is probably the best means of implementing this deeply flawed concept, it is not without risk. There could be a situation where more than 400MW applies to go on the register on the same day. The irony is that DECC should be welcoming such projects, rather than turning them away. The UK faces an impending capacity crunch in 2015-16 and the steady, baseload green electricity generation from these biomass projects is needed, and can provide significant investment and jobs across the country.
DECC has today launched a “Consultation on a notification process for new build dedicated biomass projects”, with proposals on how to limit new biomass projects [1] under the Renewables Obligation.
DECC ran a series of workshops with the REA in February, to establish the best process for implementing the 400MW cap. Much of the feedback from these workshops is reflected in the consultation document, which is welcome. However, the REA’s view that a cap on new capacity is a deeply flawed concept has not changed.
REA Chief Executive Gaynor Hartnell said:
Whilst DECC claims the cap is to do with affordability, these projects generate electricity much more cheaply than offshore wind. In addition, their cost of carbon saving is either on a par with offshore wind and can even be lower, such as in the case of some agricultural residue and waste wood projects.
Gaynor Hartnell said:
“The majority of projects proposed today could be operational, had there not been a series of policy changes and prolonged lack of clarity on the Government’s part.”
* All content is copyrighted by Industry Intelligence, or the original respective author or source. You may not recirculate, redistrubte or publish the analysis and presentation included in the service without Industry Intelligence's prior written consent. Please review our terms of use.
