Nearly 10% of U.S. low-income consumers say they would reduce consumption of fruits and vegetables after hearing negative safety messages from an activist group, new report states
June 19, 2012
– Today, the Alliance for Food and Farming issued a new report, “Scared Fat,” that illustrates how negative and misleading statements about the safety of fruits and vegetables is impacting consumption and undermining public health campaigns targeted toward improving diets and reducing obesity rates in the U.S. The Alliance will hold a conference call for media today at 12:00 p.m. PDT to present the report findings.
The new report features results of recent consumer research as well as an analysis of that research by scientists with expertise in nutrition, consumer behavior and farming. Based upon the consumer research analysis, the experts reached five key conclusions:
The consumer research clearly shows an emerging public health threat, and that although it may be unintentional, the impact of negative media reporting on food safety issues is not promoting the consumption of healthy fruits and vegetables.
We have an obesity epidemic and current media and Internet reporting is increasing fears consumers have about eating fruits and vegetables and is lowering the faith people have in the government regulations implemented to protect them.
It is inaccurate to suggest that organic is the only safe choice when it comes to selecting safe fruits and vegetables because there is no scientific consensus to substantiate this claim.
Regrettably some well-intentioned media and Internet reports on food safety may create a situation where some consumers feel like they are making inferior choices when they buy conventionally grown fruits and vegetables rather than organic.
The key message we need to continue to deliver is -- eat more fruits and vegetables.
The expert panel stated that among the most concerning consumer research findings is that almost 10 percent of low income consumers said that they would reduce consumption of fruits and vegetables after hearing negative safety messages from one activist group. Another nine percent of low income consumers stated they didn’t know what they should do. “Despite continuous and repeated government campaign initiatives communicating about the need to eat more fruits and vegetables, this group’s messaging results in almost 20 percent of the low income population considering discounting those nutrition based initiatives and advice,” says Marilyn Dolan, Executive Director of the Alliance for Food and Farming.
Members of the expert panel that analyzed the consumer research findings and developed the “Scared Fat” report will participate in today’s conference call at 12:00 p.m. PDT with the media. They include:
Christine Bruhn, Ph.D., Consumer Food Marketing Specialist, Food Science and Technology, University of California, Davis.
Elizabeth Pivonka, Ph.D., R.D., President and CEO, Produce for Better Health Foundation
Peggy Lemaux, Ph.D, Cooperative Extension Specialist MEPMB – Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California, Berkeley.
To access the press conference call, please dial (800) 398-9379. Call title: “Alliance for Food and Farming Press Conference.”
The entire “Scared Fat” report can be found at: safefruitsandveggies.com
The Alliance for Food and Farming is a non-profit organization formed in 1989 which represents organic and conventional farmers and farms of all sizes. Alliance contributors are limited to farmers of fruits and vegetables, companies that sell, market or ship fruits and vegetables or organizations that represent produce farmers. Our mission is to deliver credible information to consumers about the safety of all fruits and vegetables. We do not engage in lobbying nor do we accept any money or support from the pesticide industry. In the interest of transparency, our entire 2011 tax return is posted on safefruitsandveggies.com.
© 2017 Business Wire, Inc., All rights reserved.