Texas A&M AgriLife researchers develop method to capture ammonium from liquid animal manure that could benefit environment and confined animal operations; extracted ammonium sulfate can also be used as fertilizer, offset cost of process

Liling Tan

COLLEGE STATION, Texas , August 16, 2011 (press release) – Though it may not sound very glamorous, a new method of extracting ammonium from liquid animal manure could be exciting news for both confined animal operations and environmental groups, according to a Texas AgriLife Extension Service engineer.

The method uses gas-permeable membrane technology that tests have shown could remove 50 percent of the dissolved ammonium in liquid manure in 20 days. The removed ammonium is “not scrubbed but captured,” said Dr. Saqib Mukhtar, AgriLife Extension engineer and interim associate department head of the Texas A&M University department of biological and agricultural engineering.

By captured, Mukhtar means, the ammonium is concentrated as ammonium sulfate compound, which as commercial fertilizer could potentially offset the cost of the removal process.

Though still in the lab-bench test stage, the technology shows great promise to solve a long-standing, expensive well-documented problem that confined-animal feeding operations such as dairies and feedlots face daily, Mukhtar said.

“Excessive ammonia emissions from animal feeding operations are considered a source of odor and environmental pollution,” Mukhtar said. “Once emitted, ammonia may contribute to formation of fine airborne particulates in the presence of certain acidic compounds in the atmosphere.”

Also, ammonia emissions from improperly managed manure systems may contaminate groundwater and cause excessive vegetative growth in lakes and reservoirs, he said.

“And it may even be a constituent of nitrous oxide, a potent greenhouse gas,” he said.

There are other methods of mitigating ammonia emissions from manure storage and treatment facilities, including acidic solution-sprayed scrubbers and bio-filters, and chemicals such as acidified clays and sodium hydrogen sulfate, Mukhtar said.

“Several of these methods have been promising, but high costs, lack of ‘staying power’ of chemicals and other additives, lack of ammonia recovery for beneficial uses, and the complex operation and management of some of the technologies have restricted their extensive use in animal agriculture,” he said.

In comparison, the membrane technology Mukhtar and his associates have been testing is relatively simple.

Gas-permeable tubing is submersed in a tank of liquid manure. A very dilute solution of sulfuric acid is pumped through the tubing, which has a porosity of only 2 microns. To put this in perspective, a typical human hair is 70 microns in diameter.

The method takes advantage of a property of dissolved gases described by Fick’s first law of diffusion. A high concentration of a dissolved gas, such as ammonia, will migrate to regions of lower concentration. As the concentration of ammonium is high in the liquid manure and low to zero in the permeable tubing, the ammonium is drawn into the tubing and out of the liquid manure.

Also, the migration is enhanced by ammonium being a base and chemically attracted to the acid in the tubing.

The name of the tubular membrane they used is “expanded polytetrafluoroethylene, which is usually abbreviated ePTFE,” Mukhtar said.

The product has several uses including blood filtration and synthetic blood vessel and even dental floss, he said, and once was prohibitively expensive. But with the expiration of several patents for this material and its uses, the cost has dropped dramatically, allowing its use for other applications.

Mukhtar said the next step is to scale up from the small bench model to a large tank, perhaps 100 gallons, he said. The team also wants to experiment with how little tubing can be used, and how dilute the acid solution can be, while still capturing about 50 percent of the ammonium within a reasonable amount of time.

They are also looking ahead to learn how to economically scale up the process for use on the farm.

“Obviously, we can’t use a ‘gazillion’ feet of tubing in a large manure lagoon,” Mukhtar said. “Potentially, what we could do is divert some of the flushed manure in a much smaller basin and apply membrane technology to extract ammonia from it.”

The manure from which the ammonia has been extracted would then be transported back into the large lagoon, he said

“By doing this repeatedly, we could concentrate ammonia as a relatively high pH solution of ammonium sulfate,” Mukhtar said.

The team headed by Mukhtar includes Amir Samani Majd, a doctorate candidate; Dr. MD Borhan, assistant research scientist; and John Beseda, student technician, all based in College Station. The team presented the results of their study in a paper at the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers annual international meeting at Louisville in mid-August. The title of the paper was “An Investigation of Ammonia Extraction from Liquid Manure Using a Gas-Permeable Membrane.”

“Remember, we are capturing ammonia with this process,” Mukhtar said. “Not just scrubbing it as other processes do. We might be able to return part or all of its cost of the process as ammonium sulfate, an expensive fertilizer.”

* All content is copyrighted by Industry Intelligence, or the original respective author or source. You may not recirculate, redistrubte or publish the analysis and presentation included in the service without Industry Intelligence's prior written consent. Please review our terms of use.