June 19, 2025 (just-drinks) –
he
Despite extended sessions in the final days, the bill did not receive a vote in the Assembly and has effectively stalled for this legislative cycle, which ended on 12 June.
Though PRRIA successfully passed the
They argued the bill's aggressive packaging reduction targets and bans on certain chemicals would impose prohibitive costs on businesses and consumers alike.
Central to the opposition was the bill's exclusion of chemical recycling technologies from the definition of recycling, which industry advocates claimed would stifle innovation in sustainable waste management.
Business groups warned that the financial burdens could lead to higher prices for everyday goods and risk businesses relocating out of the state.
Supporters of PRRIA expressed deep disappointment at the bill's failure to advance before the
Environmental organisations and local governments stressed that the bill was critical for shifting waste management costs away from taxpayers and incentivising more sustainable packaging design.
They pointed to similar extended producer responsibility laws in places like
With the 2025 legislative session now behind them, advocates plan to return in 2026 with renewed efforts to pass packaging reform. Industry groups, meanwhile, remain prepared to resist regulations they view as costly and unrealistic.
Governor
The bill's pause highlights the ongoing challenge of balancing ambitious environmental goals with economic realities.
As
This article was originally published on just-drinks.com on
* All content is copyrighted by Industry Intelligence, or the original respective author or source. You may not recirculate, redistribute or publish the analysis and presentation included in the service without Industry Intelligence's prior written consent. Please review our terms of use.