May 20, 2024
(press release)
–
In a joint letter to Congress, the American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC), American Iron and Steel Institute (AISI), and Steel Manufacturers Association (SMA) outline their firm opposition to the proposed Mass Timber Federal Buildings Act (S4149) – and urge members of Congress to reject the anti-competitive bill. The bill, which was introduced by U.S. Senators Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) and James Risch (R-Idaho) on April 17, would give favorable treatment to the mass timber industry in the awarding of federal and military construction projects – at the expense of other building material competitors, including steel. The letter from steel industry leaders raised substantive concerns about the potential ramifications of this legislation on fair competition, taxpayer value, and sustainability practices within the construction sector. “While we support the exploration and development of innovative building materials, this bill, and similar efforts create an unfair contracting preference and would ultimately hinder rather than promote responsible construction practices,” the letter says. The letter is addressed to U.S. Representatives Rick Crawford (AR-1) and Frank Mrvan (IN-1), Chairman and Vice Chairman of the Congressional Steel Caucus, respectively, and outlines several critical issues with S4149. Mandated Contracting Preferences: The proposed mandate for contracting preferences favoring wood products would disrupt the competitive bidding process and undermine taxpayer value by neglecting cost-effectiveness and project suitability considerations. Supply Chain Concerns: The potential strain from a surge in demand for wood products, such as increased material costs, has broader implications on the construction industry and project budgets. Neglecting True Sustainability: Mass timber’s sustainability claims are misleading and overstated. Factors such as energy efficiency, durability, and responsible sourcing should be considered in promoting sustainable building practices. Safety Considerations: There is a need for thorough testing and code development to address concerns associated with mass timber construction. “The construction industry is constantly evolving, and mass timber should be encouraged to adopt more sustainable practices,” states the letter. “The private sector is already actively exploring and developing these materials. A government mandate that favors one industry over another, funded by taxpayers, is ill-advised.” ### For more information contact: Dani Friedland American Institute of Steel Construction The American Institute of Steel Construction, headquartered in Chicago, is a non-partisan, not-for-profit technical institute and trade association established in 1921 to serve the structural steel design community and construction industry. AISC's mission is to make structural steel the material of choice by being the leader in structural steel-related technical and market-building activities, including specification and code development, research, education, technical assistance, quality certification, standardization, market development, and advocacy. AISC has a long tradition of service to the steel construction industry of providing timely and reliable information.
Director of Marketing Communications
773.636.8535
friedland@aisc.org
130 E. Randolph St, Suite 2000
Chicago IL 60601
312.670.2401
www.aisc.org
* All content is copyrighted by Industry Intelligence, or the original respective author or source. You may not recirculate, redistrubte or publish the analysis and presentation included in the service without Industry Intelligence's prior written consent. Please review our terms of use.
